|
February 4, 2006 |
Excerpt: I want to make sure that NASA employees hear directly from me on how I view the issue of scientific openness and the role of public affairs within the agency. First, NASA has always been, is, and will continue to be committed to open scientific and technical inquiry and dialogue with the public. |
|
The Sixteenth National Conference on the Management of Research |
Excerpts When I was invited to talk with you today about management, I accepted the invitation quite readily. It isn’t often that I get the opportunity to meet seven experienced and distinguished managers. Just for the privilege or telling you the same thing everybody else does; namely, that no matter how you are running your organization, you are doing it all wrong and you should do it our way. At Marshall we can still carry an idea for a space launch vehicle and its guidance system from the concept through the entire development cycle of design, development, fabrication, and static testing, and we have every intention to preserve and nurture a limited in-house capability. The reason is simple: the ability of American industry to produce fine products is unquestionable. To market them, it has developed a persuasiveness in salesmanship that is unequaled. It's not easy for the Government to determine which bid or proposal we receive from industry is best, and how well competing claims and estimates can be substantiated. In order for us to use the very best judgment possible in spending the taxpayer's money intelligently, we just have to do a certain amount of this research and development work ourselves. We just have to keep our own hands dirty to command the professional respect of the contractor personnel engaged with actual design, shop and testing work. Otherwise, our own ability to establish standards and to evaluate the proposals -- and later the performance -- of contractors would not be up to par. Our Marshall Center engineers operate like doctors. i.e., you take the doctor away from his patients, he soon forgets how to practice medicine and starts writing books or publishing trade journals about it. |
|
|
Excerpt December 13, 2004 Dear Mr. President, It has been my distinct honor and privilege to serve in your first term. I would like nothing more than to continue to serve at your pleasure. The extraordinary opportunities you have permitted me to assume these last four years have been experiences of a lifetime. |
bush_jan_2004.htm |
Inspired by all that has come before, and guided by clear objectives, today we set a new course for America's space program. We will give NASA a new focus and vision for future exploration. We will build new ships to carry man forward into the universe, to gain a new foothold on the moon and to prepare for new journeys to the worlds beyond our own. |
| KennedySpeech.htm |
First, I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important for the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish. |
| ReaganSpeech.htm |
America has always been greatest when we dared to be great. We can reach for greatness again. We can follow our dreams to distant stars, living and working in space for peaceful, economic, and scientific gain. Tonight, I am directing NASA to develop a permanently manned space station and to do it within a decade. |
| goldin_remarks_5ps.pdf | NASA Administrator Daniel Goldin Remarks at the15th Annual NASA Continual Improvement and Reinvention Conference April 27, 2000 Conference Theme: "proper planning prevents poor performance" |
| GoldinAtPrinceton.pdf | Remarks by The Honorable Daniel S. Goldin "New Directions in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering" Princeton University, April 20, 2001 |
Home - NASA Office of Logic Design
Last Revised:
February 09, 2006
Digital Engineering Institute
Web Grunt:
Richard Katz
